<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://genre-commentary.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Genre-commentary.com - doctor who</title>
 <link>http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/7/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language></language>
<item>
 <title>The Implausibility Problem: Comparisons from RED DWARF, BLAKE’S 7, and DOCTOR WHO</title>
 <link>http://genre-commentary.com/node/87</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a time and place for crazy plots. Take, for example, the &lt;em&gt;Red Dwarf&lt;/em&gt; episode &quot;White Hole&quot; (4.4). Here the crew must rescue themselves from a time-spewing &quot;white hole&quot; by closing it up with a planet. Perfectly mundane sci fi so far -- but wait: this planet must be knocked into the white hole according to the principles of a game of pool, as if a solar system and a pool table were equivalent physical entities, or as Lister (Craig Charles) explains to Rimmer (Chris Barrie):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://genre-commentary.com/node/87&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://genre-commentary.com/node/87#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/88">bbc</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/87">blake&amp;#039;s 7</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/7">doctor who</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/85">internally consistent plots</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/86">red dwarf</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:23:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Arwen Spicer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">87 at http://genre-commentary.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gaining Momentum: The Power of Backstory in the New Doctor Who</title>
 <link>http://genre-commentary.com/node/88</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Right now, &lt;em&gt;Doctor Who&lt;/em&gt; is an unstoppable force. After 16 years on hiatus and a mediocre TV movie, the grand old staple of BBC science fiction returned in 2005 to capture a new generation of fans. Having completed its second new season (or “series” to the Brits), the show is currently preparing to launch a third season as well as a spinoff, &lt;em&gt;Torchwood&lt;/em&gt;.  Under the guiding hand of executive producer Russell T. Davies, the new &lt;em&gt;Who&lt;/em&gt; has grown up from its “children’s show” roots to become darker, more complex, more tightly arced, more psychologically realistic, and altogether very 21st century.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://genre-commentary.com/node/88&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://genre-commentary.com/node/88#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/7">doctor who</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:52:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Arwen Spicer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">88 at http://genre-commentary.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
