<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://genre-commentary.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Genre-commentary.com - bbc</title>
 <link>http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/88/feed</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language></language>
<item>
 <title>The Implausibility Problem: Comparisons from RED DWARF, BLAKE’S 7, and DOCTOR WHO</title>
 <link>http://genre-commentary.com/node/87</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a time and place for crazy plots. Take, for example, the &lt;em&gt;Red Dwarf&lt;/em&gt; episode &quot;White Hole&quot; (4.4). Here the crew must rescue themselves from a time-spewing &quot;white hole&quot; by closing it up with a planet. Perfectly mundane sci fi so far -- but wait: this planet must be knocked into the white hole according to the principles of a game of pool, as if a solar system and a pool table were equivalent physical entities, or as Lister (Craig Charles) explains to Rimmer (Chris Barrie):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://genre-commentary.com/node/87&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://genre-commentary.com/node/87#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/88">bbc</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/87">blake&amp;#039;s 7</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/7">doctor who</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/85">internally consistent plots</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/86">red dwarf</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:23:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Arwen Spicer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">87 at http://genre-commentary.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Life on Mars 1x01 - Pilot review</title>
 <link>http://genre-commentary.com/node/104</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The first few minutes of a TV pilot are massively important. A show has to hook viewers in quickly, lest the entire series get written off as dull or lackluster. The writing must be sharp and distinctive, the acting deft and subtle, and the directing offbeat enough to set it apart from everything else on the air. Not unlike a job interview, watching a pilot puts the viewer in the employer’s seat. We want to know in five to fifteen minutes why we should hire this show for the privileged position of “series recording” on our DVRs. A viewer internally asks him or herself during these first crucial minutes, “What can I get from this show that I can’t already find in half a dozen other things on the air?”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://genre-commentary.com/node/104&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://genre-commentary.com/node/104#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/88">bbc</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/65">life on mars</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/108">review</category>
 <category domain="http://genre-commentary.com/taxonomy/term/24">tv</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 08:20:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>KW Taylor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">104 at http://genre-commentary.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
